Search for: "Stills v. Superior Court of California" Results 1 - 20 of 1,277
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2011, 5:57 pm by Steven G. Pearl
The California Supreme Court just announced that it will hear oral argument in Brinker v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 8:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
Malone a predates the California Supreme Court's decision in Iskanian, but it still is worth noting. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 12:24 pm by Union and ERISA Law
Superior Court, the California Supreme Court held employers are required to provide meal periods to their employees, but they are not required to ensure employees actually take this meal period. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 12:24 pm by Union and ERISA Law
Superior Court, the California Supreme Court held employers are required to provide meal periods to their employees, but they are not required to ensure employees actually take this meal period. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 7:01 am
On July 10, 2019, the California Senate Labor, Public Employment, and Retirement Committee (Committee) advanced a proposed legislative response to the California Supreme Court's opinion in Dynamex v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 4:55 am by Steve Chemaly
Jones v Krok is still the point of departure when determining whether a foreign judgment can be enforced in South Africa. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 3:25 pm by The Complex Litigator
Superior Court (Hohnbaum) (April 12, 2012), the California Supreme Court began its opinion by observing, “For the better part of a century, California law has guaranteed to employees wage and hour protection, including meal and rest periods intended to ameliorate the consequences of long hours. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 12:45 pm by rhall@initiativelegal.com
Superior Court (42 Cal. 4th 443 (2007)) remains good law until a higher court rules otherwise. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 5:45 pm
Plaintiff has filed a petition to the California Supreme Court requesting that it review the appellate decision in Brinker v. [read post]